You are currently viewing an archival version of GF!

Click here to return to the current GamesFirst! website.

home.GIF (824 bytes)

sclogo.jpg (6686 bytes)

star06.gif (4104 bytes)star06.gif (4104 bytes)star06.gif (4104 bytes)star06.gif (4104 bytes)star06.gif (4104 bytes)

by Blizzard

cup.gif (5516 bytes)Ups:Best use of RTS genre yet,  diverse races and units. Great multiplayer. A lot of fun.
Downs: Just quibbles. 
System Reqs:
Windows 95/98/NT 4.0
Pentium 90 16mb RAM  SVGA Video Card Double-speed CD-ROM 
sc1.GIF (21584 bytes)To appreciate Blizzard’s achievement in producing a game as good as StarCraft, you have to imagine any other company doing what Blizzard did. This would include 1) releasing a real-time strategy game six months after everyone agreed RTS had peaked 2) sticking with 2D graphics and sprites at a time when everyone agrees only 3D acceleration and polygons get it anymore 3) refusing to be bullied into releasing said game early, no matter what the pressure and 4) last but not least, in the face of perhaps the most hype ever generated about any computer game, producing a game entirely lacking in the sort of gimmickry that too often passes for innovation these days, but which rather focuses on gameplay, game balance, personality and fun. Starcraft doesn’t do anything shockingly new, but Starcraft takes everything good about real-time strategy and makes it better.

I have to admit, I was skeptical about Starcraft. Like everyone else, I’d been expecting to see it on the shelves every day since last September, and after weathering the real-time glut of 1997, I was not sure that anything real-time could impress me. After Dark Reign and Total Annihilation and Age of Empires and Sid Meier’s Gettysburg and Myth—fine games all—I frankly thought that StarCraft couldn’t come up with anything to rock my world. I was a fool.

sc2.GIF (22511 bytes)My conversion came shortly into the first missions of the single player campaign. I was feeling pretty smug at this point; I’d loaded up Starcraft and played a couple of missions and was thinking, well, it’s OK—the graphics are very nice, but not the greatest, and the interface is nifty, and the Terrans have got a lot of personality, but so far nothing has sent me into paroxysms of joy. Then came my first Zerg rush. Tasked with defending my base while I awaited evacuation, I was enjoying picking off the occasional Zerg mob. Then, with time ticking down, millions of Zerg—inhuman, insectoid-like killing machines—came bounding and slithering and creeping onto my screen and into my defences. It was something. It was a spectacle. But mostly it was a rush, one of my most memorable gaming moments, and I’ve been hooked ever since. And OK, there weren’t millions of Zerg, but man, it sure did seem like it--and that any game that can create that sort of illusion has got some serious mojo workin’ for it.

sc3.GIF (17812 bytes)In the single player campaign, you’ll get the opportunity to play each of the three races—Terran, Zerg, and Protoss. At first I was somewhat disappointed by the brevity of the first campaign, in which you play the Terrans—only ten missions, and upon completing it I felt like there were still a lot of loose ends to be tied up. So I started the Zerg campaign, and I was surprised and pleased to see that the narrative I began in the Terran campaign continued--but this time from the Zerg point of view. This is a very nice and original touch, and emblematic of the care and thought Blizzard has put into every aspect of this game. One of the best things, is, of course, the diversity of the three races. One of the big complaints about Warcraft II was that the units for Orcs and Humans were essentially the same. That’s not the case in Starcraft. Terrans are the Billy Bobs of the Milky Way—they like to shoot stuff up a lot, and their arsenal will be the most familiar to players—tanks, planes, robots, battlecruisers. They have, as all the races do, some really nifty special units—like science centers, which can detect cloaked units or irradiate enemies, and Ghosts, scout-like units that can sneak into unwary enemy installations and target nukes. The Zerg are much like the aliens from the movie Alien or Tyranids from Warhammer 40K—they’re big ugly insects that obey the overmind, excell in hand-to-hand combat, and can build their wonderfully disgusting bio-buildings only on a weird carpet of excretion called "creep." The Protoss are the most advanced of the races, beings that have advanced psionic powers, wield energy shields, and have lots of nasty tricks, like teleportation and casting nasty spells, up their sleeves. They’re also no pushover in a toe-to-toe fight; the Protoss zealot is by far the toughest basic unit of any army, and the Protoss Archons are both beautiful and utterly deadly.

sc4.GIF (21475 bytes)All of these races are very, very, different, but—and here I take my hat off to Blizzard—none of them is dominant. All races have strengths and weaknesses, and playing through the campaign is a great way to get a feel for all of them. This balance extends not just to the races, but also to the units within each race’s army. No one unit will win the battle for you. Unlike Warcraft, you can’t just launch the equivalent of an ogre rush and expect to win. All the units are useful—even the lowly Terran marine is one tough hombre, especially when bunkered up—but none is overpowering. Terran battlecruisers are powerful, but if you send a bunch of them unsupported into your enemy’s base, they’re history.

Some have complained about the limited number of units in Starcraft, especially when it is compared to some of the other RTS games released this year, but frankly I’ve found every unit in Starcraft to useful, unlike many of the units in other games.

Graphics aren’t amazing—by that I mean they aren’t 3D--but they are very good, as good as any 2D graphics out there, I’d say. There are lots of translucency effects, especially with the Protoss, the shadowing is just incredible, and units have lots of personality. You’ll have your own favorites, but I’m a big fan of the Terran Goliath, Zerg Guardian, and Protoss Archon. The terrain is very good as well, and short of 3D acceleration it’s hard to think of anything more one could ask for.

Sound effects are very nice. The music is different for each race, and is very atmospheric. And as in Warcraft, the sound effects are both well-done and funny. Many of them include clever references popular culture, from in Robocop to the Simpsons to Gomer Pyle, USMC (!).

sc5.GIF (17049 bytes)As good as the single player campaign is, StarCraft’s real strength is its multiplayer capability. You can play for free on, and it’s a blast. You can play the standard free for all, or you can ally with a partner, or you can play games like Slaughter or Capture the Flag. It’s enough easy to find a game, and while you will occasionally encounter your run-of-the-mill online cretin, most players are good Joes. And if you ever run out of multiplayer maps, the game has the best map editor I’ve ever seen. I always plan to get around to using map editors that come with games, but something comes up and I lose interest and I don’t. This time I will.

The bottom line with Starcraft is that it’s just plain fun, and you can’t fake that. No matter how much money you pour into a game, no matter how flashy the graphics are, no matter how innovative the interface or features, if the game isn’t fun, it’s not a good game. I don’t know how Blizzard does it, but every game they make is fun, and Starcraft is no exception. Here’s how good Starcraft is: I review a lot of games, and most of the time I get bored with even the very good ones by the time I finish reviewing them; usually I just want to get on to the next one. But I really hope nobody sends me anything to review for a while, just so I can spend more time with Starcraft.

cheat.gif (1707 bytes)--Rick Fehrenbacher